Microbes, not fossil fuels, drove methane growth between 2020–22
Title image: The Pantanal, located in South America, is the world's largest tropical wetland. Tropical wetlands are responsible for about a fifth of the world's methane emissions. (Credit: )
Microbes in the environment, not fossil fuels, have been driving the recent surge in methane emissions globally, according to published Oct 21 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences by Ҵýƽ researchers and collaborators.
“Understanding where the methane is coming from helps us guide effective mitigation strategies,” said Sylvia Michel, a senior research assistant at the Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR) and a doctoral student in the Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences at Ҵýƽ. “We need to know more about those emissions to understand what kind of climate future to expect.”
Methane is a potent greenhouse gas responsible for about a third of the planet’s warming since industrialization. Although the atmosphere contains less methane than carbon dioxide, over a 100-year time frame, making it a critical target for addressing climate change.
“Methane concentrations in the air have almost tripled since the 1700s,” said co-author Jianghanyang (Ben) Li, an assistant professor in the Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and INSTAAR.
But unlike CO2, which can stay in the atmosphere for thousands of years, methane degrades within a decade. As a result, addressing methane emissions can have an immediate and powerful impact in slowing the rate of warming, making it a “low-hanging fruit,” Li said.
Sylvia Michel
While the finding suggests microbes have been emitting more methane than fossil fuels in recent years, reducing fossil fuel consumption remains key to addressing climate change, the team said. Cutting down food waste and consuming less red meat can also help lower one’s methane footprint.
ID the source
Previous research suggests fossil fuel production is responsible for about 30% of global methane emissions.
But microbial sources—such as wetlands, cattle and landfills— are an even more significant source of methane, accounting for more than half of global emissions. Archaea, a type of microorganism living in soil and the guts of cows, produce methane as a byproduct of breaking down organic matter.
Michel and Li have been working with Boulder’s (GML) at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) over the past years.
The lab receives air samples from 22 sites around the world every week or two. Researchers then isolate different components of the air—such as CO2 or methane—for analysis. By examining the types of carbon atoms, or isotopes, that the methane sample contains, Michel, Li and the team can identify its source. For example, methane from fossil fuels has more carbon-13 isotope than methane in the air, and methane from microbial sources contains even less carbon-13. The lab has been measuring isotopes of methane since 1998.
Scientists have observed a rapid increase in atmospheric methane levels since 2007, following a period of stabilization in the early 21st century. In 2020, NOAA reported the highest growth rate of methane since it began collecting data in 1983, and that record was shattered again in 2021.
At the same time, Michel noticed a surprising decrease in the carbon-13 isotope over the past 17 years. She and the team set out to understand what was driving it.
The culprit
Using computer simulations, Michel and her team modeled three different emissions scenarios to see which one would leave an isotopic signature similar to the one observed.
They found that between 2020 and 2022, the drastic increase in atmospheric methane was driven almost entirely by microbial sources. Since 2007, scientists have observed microbes playing a significant role in methane emissions, but their contribution has surged to over 90% starting in 2020.
“Some prior studies have suggested that human activities, especially fossil fuels, were the primary source of methane growth in recent years,” said , a scientist at the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) at Ҵýƽ and NOAA. She leads the reporting on NOAA’s global greenhouse gas trends at the GML. “These studies failed to look at the isotope profile of methane, which could lead to a different conclusion and an incomplete picture of global methane emissions.”
It remains unclear whether the increased microbial emissions came from natural sources like wetlands or human-driven sources, such as landfills and agriculture. The team plans to delve deeper to identify the exact source of methane.
“In a warming world, it wouldn't be surprising if any of these sources emitted more methane,” said Michel, who explained that microbes, like humans, tend to have higher metabolism when it’s warm. “Consequently, more methane could stay in the atmosphere to accelerate global warming. So we need to address the climate crisis, and that really means addressing CO2 emissions.”