Faculty

听

Respondents

1,784听

Possible Respondents

4,742听

听

Response Rate

37.6 %

(+/- 1.83% Margin of Error)

听

Index and Overall Average Scores

The survey results provide both overall scores, as well as engagement index scores. The engagement index score is derived from items on the survey that are most highly correlated with research on engagement.听 The following are rated on a 6-point scale:听

Index 4.18

Overall Average 4.51

听

Faculty Survey Categories

Survey Category
(in order of percent favorable response)

 % Favorable听

Department Collaboration

85.1

Department Leadership

83.1

Alignment

82.7

University Collaboration

81.1

College Dean

74.4

Growth

72.7

Recognition

70.7

Resources

68.6

Compensation and Rewards

65.8

Quality/Innovation

65.6

Executive Leadership

59.7

听

Faculty Engagement Score

Percent Favorability听is significantly different (p<.05) from the category average, where:

= High听 听 = Low

Faculty Engagement Item
(in order of performance)

 % Favorable

Willing to put in extra effort to help 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 be successful

95.0听

Proud to be associated with 蜜桃传媒破解版下载

93.0听

Association with 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 has enriched my career

90.9听

Would recommend 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 as a good place to work

88.0听

Overall satisfaction with my experiences at 蜜桃传媒破解版下载

83.7

Feel a strong sense of belonging to 蜜桃传媒破解版下载

73.6听听

蜜桃传媒破解版下载 helps keep me passionate about my higher ed. career

72.4听

Not seriously considered leaving 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 for another position

60.3听听

Faculty Engagement

82.2

听

听

听

Most Favorable Survey Items

Percent Favorability听is significantly different (p<.05) from the category average, where:

= High听 听 = Low

Survey Category
(in order of highest percent favorable)

% Favorable听

听

I love the Boulder region. [Alignment]

94.4听

蜜桃传媒破解版下载 faculty are open to sharing innovative ideas with one another. [University Collaboration]

90.0听

Faculty in my academic unit treat each other with respect. [Department Collaboration]

86.8

Faculty and staff have a mutual respect for one another and work well together. [Department Collaboration]

86.5

I love working for 蜜桃传媒破解版下载. [Alignment]

86.1听

I trust other faculty members in my academic unit.听听[Department Collaboration]

86.0

Faculty members' actions support 蜜桃传媒破解版下载's vision and strategic imperatives. [Alignment]

85.8听

听

听

听 听 听 听 听 听 听 听听

Least Favorable Survey Items

Percent Favorability听is significantly different (p<.05) from the category average, where:

= High听 听 = Low

Survey Category
(in order of lowest percent favorable)

 % Favorable

The executive leadership at 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 is accessible to faculty members. [Executive Leadership]

50.5听

Considering higher education settings, I feel my pay is competitive. [Compensation and Rewards]

51.8听

The executive leadership shares the reasons why key decisions are made with faculty. [Executive Leadership]

52.5听

蜜桃传媒破解版下载 rewards its faculty members for excellence in service. [Recognition]

53.9听

The executive leadership at 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 communicates effectively with faculty members. [Executive Leadership]

54.0听

蜜桃传媒破解版下载 rewards its faculty members for excellence in teaching. [Recognition]

58.6听

At UC Boulder, failures are seen as opportunities for learning and growth. [Quality/Innovation]

60.4听

听

听

Engagement by:

Length of Service

Length of Service听 % Favorable Response on Engagement Items
Less than 1 year (n=200) 93.1听
1 to 2 years (n=246) 86.2
3 to 5 years (n=328) 83.8
6 to 10 years (n=322) 78.8
11 to 15 years (n=218) 77.5
16 to 20 years (n=162) 80.9
More than 20 years (n=248) 81.8
Prefer not to answer (n=54) 63.2听

听

Age Group

Age Group % Favorable Response on Engagement Items
20 to 29 (n=131) 89.7听听
30 to 39 (n=492) 84.1
40 to 49 (n=448) 80.3
50 to 59 (n=383) 80.9
60 to 64 (n=122) 84.1
65 or over (n=105) 86.0
Prefer not to answer (n=97) 70.2听

听

Disability Status

Disability Status % Favorable Response on Engagement Items
Disability Identification-No (n=1,602) 83.6
Disability Identification-Yes (n=53) 70.8听
Prefer not to answer (n=106) 65.3听

听

Percent Favorability is significantly different (p<.05) from the item鈥檚 overall category average; CU-B Average; where,

= High听 听 = Low

Race Category

Race Category % Favorable Response on Engagement Items
American Indian and Alaska Native (n=11)听 81.8
Asian (n=143) 80.8
White (n=1,358) 72.6听
Hispanic or Latino (n=89) 72.3听
Black or African American (n=22) 71.6
Other (n=22) 69.6
Prefer not to answer (n=184) 63.3听

听

Gender

Gender % Favorable Response on Engagement Items
Man (n=889) 83.6
Woman (n=758) 83.0
Gender Diverse (n=14) 72.1
Prefer not to answer (n=111) 66.3听

听

Staff

Respondents

2,777听

Possible Respondents

4,259听

听

Response Rate

65.2 %

(+/- 1.10% Margin of Error)

Staff Engagement Index and Overall Average Scores

The survey results provide both overall scores, as well as engagement index scores. The engagement index score is derived from items on the survey that are most highly correlated with research on engagement.听 The following are rated on a 6-point scale:听

Index 4.68

Overall Average 4.43

Engagement Index Questions听

According to research, the following survey questions are most aligned with the engagement index:

  • I am proud to work for 蜜桃传媒破解版下载.
  • My effort directly affects the success of 蜜桃传媒破解版下载.
  • I have not seriously considered leaving 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 for another job.
  • I would recommend employment at 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 to my friends.
  • I feel a strong sense of belonging to 蜜桃传媒破解版下载.
  • I am willing to put in effort beyond what is expected to help 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 be successful.
  • I often leave work with a feeling of satisfaction about my job.
  • I feel I am a part of 蜜桃传媒破解版下载's mission.

Engagement Index Score

Group score is significantly different (p<.05) from the 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 Staff Score, where:

= High听 听 = Low

Staff Engagement Item
(in order of performance)

 % Favorable

I am willing to put in effort beyond what is expected to help 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 be successful.

 96.5听

I am proud to work for 蜜桃传媒破解版下载.

 94.3听

My effort directly affects the success of 蜜桃传媒破解版下载.

 92.0听

I would recommend employment at 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 to my friends.

 89.6听

I feel I am a part of 蜜桃传媒破解版下载's mission.

 87.6听

I often leave work with a feeling of satisfaction about my job.

 82.1听

I feel a strong sense of belonging to 蜜桃传媒破解版下载.

 80.1听听

I have not seriously considered leaving 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 for another job.

 63.6听听

Staff Engagement听

85.7听听

听

Employee Survey Categories

Group score is significantly different (p<.05) from the 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 Staff Score, where:

= High听 听 = Low

Survey Category
(in order of percent favorable response)

 % Favorable听

Compliance

87.5听

Engagement

85.8听

Supervisor/Chair

84.0听

Career Growth

83.0听

Teamwork

81.2

Quality

80.8

Pay & Benefits

77.6听听

Affinity

77.3听听

Executive Leadership

75.9听听

Department Head

75.1听听

Innovation

 70.5听听

Highest Performing Survey Items

Group score is significantly different (p<.05) from the 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 Staff Score, where:

= High听 听 = Low

Survey Items
(in order of performance by % Favorable)

 % Favorable

I understand the benefits offered to me by 蜜桃传媒破解版下载.听(Pay & Benefits)

 95.0听

My daily work is aligned with the mission of 蜜桃传媒破解版下载.听 (Quality)

 94.2听

I understand what I need to do to be successful in my job. (Career Growth)

 92.4听

I have opportunities to develop friendships at work. (Teamwork)

 91.9听

I love the Boulder region. (Affinity)

 91.3听

听

Lowest Performing Survey Items

Group score is significantly different (p<.05) from the 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 Staff Score, where:

= High听 听 = Low

Survey Items
(in order of performance by % Favorable)

 % Favorable

I could not imagine working for another organization. (Affinity)

 49.8听

We have enough employees in my work area to do our jobs well. (Quality)

 58.5听

蜜桃传媒破解版下载 eliminates challenges/barriers so we can complete our work efficiently. (Teamwork)

 59.1听

Compared with similar jobs in my field, I feel I am paid fairly. (Pay & Benefits)

 61.5听

Employees at 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 are encouraged to take risks and try new approaches. (Innovation)

 68.0听

听

Key Drivers of Employee Engagement

Group score is significantly different (p<.05) from the 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 Staff Score, where:

= High听 听 = Low

Survey Items
(in order of influence on employee engagement at 蜜桃传媒破解版下载)

 % Favorable

I feel challenged to do my best at 蜜桃传媒破解版下载. (Career Growth)

 85.7听

My daily work is aligned with the mission of 蜜桃传媒破解版下载. (Quality)

 94.2听

蜜桃传媒破解版下载 has a work environment that allows me to grow and develop. (Career Growth)

 77.6听

The actions of the executive leadership give 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 a competitive edge in higher education. (Executive Leadership)

 77.5

I understand the vision and strategic imperatives of 蜜桃传媒破解版下载. (Quality)

 87.3听

听

Engagement Results By:

Length of Service

Length of Service %听Favorable Response on Engagement Items
Less than 1 year (n=303) 92.4
1 to 2 years (n=476) 86.0
3 to 5 years (n=611) 84.2
6 to 10 years (n=497) 83.6
11 to 15 years (n=310) 85.0
16 to 20 years (n=221) 85.2
More than 20 years (n=248) 89.7听
Perfer not to answer (n=95) 78.1

听

Generation

Generation % Favorable Response on Engagement Items
Traditionalist - Before 1946 (n=18) 88.1
Baby Boomers - 1946 to 1964 (n=773) 87.2
Generation X - 1965 to 1976 (n=791) 86.3
Generation Y - 1977 to 1996 (n=1,186) 84.5

听

Gender

Gender % Favorable Response on Engagement Items
Man (n=990) 87.0
Woman (n=1,543) 86.2
Gender Diverse (n=24) 79.8
Prefer Not to Answer (n=194) 76.6听

听

Group score is significantly different (p<.05) from the 蜜桃传媒破解版下载 Staff Score, where:

= High听 = Low

Race Category

Race Category % Favorable Response on Engagement Items
Asian听(n=165) 91.6听
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander (n=9) 89.9
Hispanic or Latino (n=253)

88.8
Black or African American (n=63) 86.4
White (n=2,056) 85.5
American Indian and Alaskan Native (n=36) 85.0
Other (n=35) 80.2
Prefer not to answer (n=247) 79.9听

听

Disability Status

Disability Status % Favorable Response on Engagement Items
Disability Identification - No (n=2,406) 86.3
Disability Identification - Yes (n=120) 84.8
Prefer Not to Answer (n=187) 86.3听

听

Workplace Accommodations

Workplace Accommodations % Favorable Response on Engagement Items
Workplace Accommodations听- No (n=2,397) 86.2
Workplace Accommodations听- Yes (n=115) 84.7
Prefer Not to Answer (n=179) 78.0听

听